[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RSS and its antics
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Friends
i hope u guys noticed the idiotic blabber of K R Malkani - i don't know
whether he is from RSS or BJP - that too when the relations with Nepal were
already strained!
certainly with "Patriots" like that we don't need "Traitors" - may be these
are the guys that Thackeray wants to disenfranchise!
sivaram
Padmanabha Rao <kvprao@igidr.ac.in> wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Krishna C Tripathi wrote:
It was an interesting reply. 7643tu2ydu3274627. You can read my
sentence. But try now.btb yIyubytubytuyu byuisyub unyuout
uyuaylwrtrayrryvsv wcrtortvvrtretct. Could you read the above sentence ?
I don't think. It is not possible to read the above sentence because of
lot of garbage. Some one is repeating some thing nonsense , when I am
writing "It is no always correct." And that is why Krishnan Kandasamy is
arguing about "RSS does not have a right to tell us what to do". Beacuse
in presence of enough noise the actuall message also gets lost.
Freedom of speech does not mean Freedom to make others listen.
If this was directed at my post, could you please repeat it ? I couldn't
get the context.
Thanks.
Padmanabha Rao
--- Padmanabha Rao wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Krishnan Kandasamy wrote:
> ...RSS or other have no business to tell us how we
> should live our lives
> that is all.
>
> The act of "telling" actually flows from the act of
> listening or reacting...
> only means to reconcile
> differences in worldview and opinion is through
> persuasion. Rhetoric and
> Listservs don't make a silly dent in the affairs. We
> ought to be thinking
> on the opportunities where the persuasion will be
> 'unleashed'.
> Similarly the persuasion is two-way, whether between
> me-RSS, RSS-nonRSS,
> India-US or whatever. It's easy to lose sight or
> these "obvious" things.
> Hence my persuasion here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform. debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives: ../debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
--0-816072604-978444662=:34449
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<P> Hi Friends</P>
<P>i hope u guys noticed the idiotic blabber of K R Malkani - i don't
know whether he is from RSS or BJP - that too when the relations with Nepal
were already strained!</P>
<P>certainly with "Patriots" like that we don't need "Traitors" - may be
these are the guys that Thackeray wants to disenfranchise!<BR></P>
<P>sivaram</P>
<P> <B><I>Padmanabha Rao <kvprao@igidr.ac.in></I></B> wrote: <BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT:
#1010ff 2px
solid">---------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate
it!<BR>---------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Krishna C Tripathi wrote:<BR>It was an interesting
reply. 7643tu2ydu3274627. You can read my<BR>sentence. But try now.btb
yIyubytubytuyu byuisyub unyuout<BR>uyuaylwrtrayrryvsv wcrtortvvrtretct.
Could you read the above sentence ?<BR>I don't think. It is not possible to
read the above sentence because of<BR>lot of garbage. Some one is repeating
some thing nonsense , when I am<BR>writing "It is no always correct." And
that is why Krishnan Kandasamy is<BR>arguing about "RSS does not have a
right to tell us what to do". Beacuse<BR>in presence of enough noise the
actuall message also gets lost.<BR>Freedom of speech does not mean Freedom
to make others listen.<BR><BR>If this was directed at my post, could you
please repeat it ? I couldn't<BR>get the
context.<BR><BR>Thanks.<BR>Padmanabha Rao<BR><BR><BR><BR>--- Padmanabha Rao
<KVPRAO@IGIDR.AC.IN>wrote:<BR><BR>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Krishnan
Kandasamy wrote:<BR>> ...RSS or other have no business to tell us how
we<BR>> should live our lives<BR>> that is all.<BR>><BR>> The
act of "telling" actually flows from the act of<BR>> listening or
reacting...<BR>> only means to reconcile<BR>> differences in
worldview and opinion is through<BR>> persuasion. Rhetoric and<BR>>
Listservs don't make a silly dent in the affairs. We<BR>> ought to be
thinking<BR>> on the opportunities where the persuasion will be<BR>>
'unleashed'. <BR>> Similarly the persuasion is two-way, whether
between<BR>> me-RSS, RSS-nonRSS,<BR>> India-US or whatever. It's easy
to lose sight or<BR>> these "obvious" things.<BR>> Hence my
persuasion
here.<BR><BR><BR>-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------<<a href="http://photos.yahoo.com/";>Yahoo! Photos</a> -
Share your holiday photos online!
--0-816072604-978444662=:34449--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform. debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives: ../debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------